Approximately four weeks ahead of the ITC hearing on Microsoft's complaint against Barnes & Noble, the scope of the investigation has been narrowed. Microsoft and Barnes & Noble filed a stipulation yesterday (which entered the public record today) according to which Microsoft withdraws all of the asserted claims from one patent and some of the asserted claims from the four remaining patents. The stipulation expressly states that this is "not an admission as to the merits of any claim" but merely meant to "simplify the Investigation, streamline the hearing, and converse the Parties' and Commission's resources in consideration of the amount of time allotted for the hearing".
The ITC's Administrative Law Judges routinely encourage complainants to narrow their case, and if patent claims get dropped, it typically happens a few weeks ahead of trial, in mid-trial, or shortly thereafter. Last week, Motorola dropped (a few weeks after the hearing) one of its patents-in-suit against Apple.
Here's a table that shows the impact of the stipulation:
|6,339,780||Loading status in a hypermedia browser having a limited available display area|
1-6, 9-14, 17-26, 29-42
|6,891,551||Selection handles in editing electronic documents|
7, 9, 11
1-3, 5, 8, 10
|6,957,233||Method and apparatus for capturing and rendering annotations for non-modifiable electronic content|
|5,889,522||System provided child window controls|
|5,778,372||Remote retrieval and display management of electronic document with incorporated images|
This looks like a thorough streamlining to me. At the ITC, which operates under more rigid timelines and page limits than the district courts, less (in terms of fewer patent claims) can be more (in terms of the final outcome).
If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.
Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: