On March 16, I reported on the ITC's final ruling that cleared Motorola Mobility of any violation of three Apple patents at issue in that investigation, and said that "Apple can appeal this decision to the Federal Circuit, and in my view, this [was] very likely to happen". And indeed, it has just happened, as I found out from a joint status report that Apple and Motorola filed in the Western District of Wisconsin, which is one of four U.S. districts in which they're presently suing each other. Here's the relevant passage (click to enlarge or skip to the quote provided below the image):
"ALJ Essex issued a final initial determination (the 'Final ID') on January 13, 2012 finding that no violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act has occurred [FOSS Patents post]. On March 16, 2012, the ITC determined to review the Final ID in part, and on review, to affirm ALJ Essex’s finding of no violation of Section 337. The Commission issued an opinion affirming ALJ Essex’s finding on March 28, 2012. Apple filed a Petition for Review of the Commission’s decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on April 12, 2012."
In December, Apple appealed the unfavorable parts of the ITC's ruling on its first complaint against HTC. HTC also appealed the import ban that was ordered against all HTC Android devices implementing a certain feature ("data tapping"). That import ban will finally take effect this coming Thursday (April 19, 2012), though HTC removed the feature immediately -- a fact that shows that the ITC granted a far longer transitional period than necessary.
HTC also appealed the ITC's dismissal of its first complaint against Apple. Furthermore, HTC affiliate S3 Graphics also appealed the dismissal of its first complaint against Apple. (Both HTC and S3G brought new ITC complaints against Apple last summer, not long after Apple had filed a second one against HTC.)
There will likely be more appeals against ITC rulings in the months ahead.
A couple of Android-related federal court decisions (interim decisions, not final rulings) have also been appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). In early December, Apple appealed to the CAFC a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to deny a preliminary injunction against four Samsung devices. On April 6, 2012, the CAFC held a hearing at which Apple restated the reasons for which it believes to be entitled to a preliminary injunction. Bloomberg's patent expert Susan Decker attended and reported on that hearing. And in February, the CAFC denied a Google petition to strike an incriminating piece of evidence, known as the "Lindholm email", from the Oracle case. That case is scheduled to go to trial (finally) tomorrow (Monday, April 16, 2012).
If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.
Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: